<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play by the rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/play-by-the-rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Sinkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/play-by-the-rules/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sinkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/?page_id=25#comment-9</guid>
		<description>It’s off side; player is technically in play however, the player is causing a stoppage for his team. The player would only be considered for too many men if he plays the puck or makes contact with another player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s off side; player is technically in play however, the player is causing a stoppage for his team. The player would only be considered for too many men if he plays the puck or makes contact with another player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Sinkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/play-by-the-rules/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sinkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/?page_id=25#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Reader Steve asks the question:
During a change, a player leaving the ice is  standing by the player bench door in the offensive zone waiting to enter the bench.  His replacement has already entered the ice in the nuetral zone as the puck moves into the offensive zone, meaining both players have their skates on the ice.   The player leaving the ice is standing on the ice in the offensive zone but legally ok as he is at the door.  Is this an offside situation, or is he technically off the ice as he stands by the door leaving the ice.  If he is ruled offside, then that means he is still in play, and if his replacement is on the ice, then this should be maybe called too many players on the ice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reader Steve asks the question:<br />
During a change, a player leaving the ice is  standing by the player bench door in the offensive zone waiting to enter the bench.  His replacement has already entered the ice in the nuetral zone as the puck moves into the offensive zone, meaining both players have their skates on the ice.   The player leaving the ice is standing on the ice in the offensive zone but legally ok as he is at the door.  Is this an offside situation, or is he technically off the ice as he stands by the door leaving the ice.  If he is ruled offside, then that means he is still in play, and if his replacement is on the ice, then this should be maybe called too many players on the ice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Sinkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/play-by-the-rules/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sinkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/?page_id=25#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Good Question Brian and there has always been confusion with this situation. The NCAA blue book states that the teams play 4 on 4 assuming they were before the infractions, you will have to check the league you are officiating to see if they modified that rule. While on that subject, you should know that the face off location in this situation is the nearest dot when the puck was last played. The same holds true if you have separated penalties during the same stoppage of play. Some coaches will argue that the faceoff goes in the zone of the first team penalized....not true and don&#039;t fall for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Question Brian and there has always been confusion with this situation. The NCAA blue book states that the teams play 4 on 4 assuming they were before the infractions, you will have to check the league you are officiating to see if they modified that rule. While on that subject, you should know that the face off location in this situation is the nearest dot when the puck was last played. The same holds true if you have separated penalties during the same stoppage of play. Some coaches will argue that the faceoff goes in the zone of the first team penalized&#8230;.not true and don&#8217;t fall for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/play-by-the-rules/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/?page_id=25#comment-6</guid>
		<description>As a 2 nd year official I have a question. Using the NCAA rule book If I called  matching penalties, one on each team during the same stoppage, do the teams  play 4 on 4 (I have seen a memo at one of the rinks saying that it should be 4 on 4) or is it  5 on 5 like Usa hockey.  I have seen other refs including myself that keep the teams 5 on 5.  Is this correct???  Or should it be 4 on 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 2 nd year official I have a question. Using the NCAA rule book If I called  matching penalties, one on each team during the same stoppage, do the teams  play 4 on 4 (I have seen a memo at one of the rinks saying that it should be 4 on 4) or is it  5 on 5 like Usa hockey.  I have seen other refs including myself that keep the teams 5 on 5.  Is this correct???  Or should it be 4 on 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
