<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Brad May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/tag/brad-may/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Rule 32.2- Disputes</title>
		<link>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/nhl-rule-32-2-disputes</link>
		<comments>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/nhl-rule-32-2-disputes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sinkiewicz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis LaRue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhl rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule 32.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video replay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of buzzing in the hockey world about this rule in the NHL rule book. The first incident this season happened in the King/Rangers game on October 14th. The Referee apparently blew the whistle after the puck had crossed the goal line and waved the goal off. The play went to <a href='http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/nhl-rule-32-2-disputes'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://cdn.nhl.com/images/upload/2009/10/book23.jpg" alt="" width="275" height="453" />There has been a lot of buzzing in the hockey world about this rule in the NHL rule book. The first incident this season happened in the King/Rangers game on October 14th. The Referee apparently blew the whistle after the puck had crossed the goal line and waved the goal off. The play went to video review and the call was over turned. Naturally Kings fans were pretty pissed as the call went against them. The most recent occurrence happened Wednesday night when Brad May appeared to have tied the game for the Red Wings late in the third period when Dennis LaRue waived the goal off even though he had blown the whistle after the puck had crossed the goal line. In this situation, the play was reviewed but the Referee over ruled the replay. Okay your probably saying, what is the point of replay then. Two different outcomes on similar situations. Here is the NHL rule right out of the book.<span id="more-579"></span><em><strong></strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>32.2 Disputes -</strong> The Referees shall have general supervision of the game and shall have full control of all game officials and players during the game, including stoppages; and in case of any dispute, their decision shall be final.</em></p>
<p><em> As there is a human factor involved in blowing the whistle to stop play, the Referee may deem the play to be stopped slightly prior to the whistle actually being blown. The fact that the puck may come loose or cross the goal line prior to the sound of the whistle has no bearing if the Referee has ruled that the play had been stopped prior to this happening.</em></p>
<p><em> In the event of any dispute regarding time or the expiration of penalties, the matter shall be referred to the Referee for adjustment and his decision shall be final. He may use the Video Goal Judge to assist in rendering the final decision. See Rule 39 – Video Goal Judge.</em></p>
<p>Being a referee as you know, I wanted to put my two cents in and try to explain the logic in the rule. Hockey is an extremely fast sport and things happen in a split second and that is what the rule is designed for. There are several reasons why you need this rule and I will give you a couple of examples. The whistle could of been defective, laugh all you want but that cork ball inside the whistle can freeze, preventing the whistle from working properly. The Referee could of gotten bumped or obstructed while lifting his arm to blow the whistle. Another thing that may of happened was that he was distracted by an altercation in front of the net. Amongst other things, those are some examples.</p>
<p>My only beef with the two situations is that they had different outcomes, making the rule inconsistent. In the Kings/Rangers game, the referee let the replay booth dictate the call when ultimately he has the final say. The crew on Wednesday night in the Detroit/Dallas game got it right, the replay booth told LaRue it was a goal and he explained that his intent was to blow the whistle. By LaRue stating his actions as he did, that voids the replay as his call was the play was dead before the puck crossed the line.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sticktohockey.com%2Fblog%2Fnhl-rule-32-2-disputes&amp;linkname=NHL%20Rule%2032.2-%20Disputes"><img src="http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sticktohockey.com/blog/nhl-rule-32-2-disputes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
